Why is the Trinity Doctrine False:
Short Video: Simple Bible Word that Proves Trinity False

We will first look at what the Church did after it became the law of the land ?
        Be sure to look up the "Code Of Justinian Book 1 - Title 1 for yourself.

Here is an excerpt from the Code of Justinian: Book 1-- Title 1.

CONCERNING THE MOST EXALTED TRINITY AND THE CATHOLIC FAITH AND PROVIDING THAT NO ONE SHALL DARE TO PUBLICLY OPPOSE THEM.

"... we should believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit constitute a single Deity, endowed with equal majesty, and united in the Holy Trinity.

(1)  We order all those who follow this law to assume the name of Catholic Christians, and considering others as demented and insane, We order that they shall bear the infamy of heresy ... "

This is part of the very first law in the Code; which shows that the trinity was the cornerstone of the Roman religious system.

You were forced to believe in the trinity or you were a criminal in the eyes of the Roman Empire!  And you were made to obey or KILLED.

Now be honest and tell me if this is somthing that the Lord Jesus would of sactioned.

Does this sound like worshipping GOD willfully, lovingly, and correctly? No!

It is coercion and control in the tradition of Babylon, home of the original Trinitarian religion.

This part of the Code was finished in 529.

To this day, volumes of books have been written trying to explain the trinity. Yet for all the convoluted, philosophical, and legalistic sounding explanations offered; the only one that most Trinitarians agree with is that it is a "mystery of faith". Mystery=unknown, cannot be explained.

"That all the people of the earth may know that the LORD is God, and that there is none else"(1 Kings 8:60).

How can you truly know GOD if you cannot explain him?

Still, the vast majority of "Christians" regard the trinity as the "central dogma of faith".

Of all the things brought into question during the Protestant Reformation, the trinity was not one of them.

Protestants were just as fervent as Catholics in their hatred of Michael Servetus.

Why? Because he did not believe in the trinity and argued publicly against it. Servetus was burned at the stake as a result of two charges brought against him; he did not believe the trinity and was against infant baptism.

Only GOD knows the real number of people who have been killed over time for refusing to believe in the trinity. And like Michael Servetus, many have been killed not by heathens, but by "supposed" Christians.

It truly amazes me that any of us could ever hold on to such a doctrine and even KILL for it.  This dogma didn't become a doctrine until the 4th century and didn't become the law until the year 529. 

During this time period, A new form of Water Baptism to fit their newly formed trinity doctrine became the rule of the land. Instead of Baptizing in His Proper Name, (Lord Jesus Christ), as all the true church had up until this time.  They now started baptizing in three of His titles (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit).  Some of the church had lost the revelation of who Jesus was (Mat 16:17) and all those that wouldn't bow to this new law were marked as heretic, inprisoned or killed.

The Godhead is the most important doctrine in the bible, for Jesus said that He would build His church upon it.  Matthew 16:17, it was a revelation then and it is still a revelation today.

I pray that you truly think on this.

1. Is this what Jesus told us to do, to kill all those that appose our doctrine?

2. Did the early church, the book of Acts or any of the epistles teach to make people believe or Kill them?

3. Did the early church, the book of Acts or any of the epistles do water baptism saying "Father, Son, & Holy Ghost" ?

4. Is there one place in all of the Holy Bible that anyone was ever baptized in the three titles "Father, Son, & Holy Ghost" ?     NO

5. If you think that Peter was in error, how was it that even if his shadow fell on someone as he walked, THEY WERE HEALED ?  Acts 5:15

6.  Is it even possible that Peter full of the Holy Ghost in Acts 2:38 could of disobeyed Jesus in Matthew 28:19 ?  If you believe that Peter was wrong, than the Bible past the 4 gospels is a LIE to you.  For you believe it has major errors in it.

7. Paul, having not even talked to Peter, baptized the same way as Peter, How do you explain that ?

If we do not turn back to the True Word of God, then Jesus said this,  John 8:24 "... for if ye believe not that I am He, ye shall die in your sins".

What is the relationship of Jesus Christ to God?

These two questions are fundamental to Christianity. The traditional answer of Christendom is given by its doctrine of the trinity. In the first few centuries of Christianity, however, this formulation was by no means the definitive one. In fact, The New Catholic Encyclopedia states that in the second century A.D. “a Trinitarian solution was still in the future” and that Trinitarian dogma “was not solidly established.., prior to the end of the 4th century.”

There were many explanations of the nature of God and Christ, several of which enjoyed widespread acceptance. One of the most important of these was modalistic monarchianism, which affirmed both the absolute oneness of the Godhead and the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Undoubtedly, the modalists’ doctrine was misunderstood, misrepresented, and distorted in the process. It is impossible, therefore, to find a precise description of the belief of a particular modalist. However, by putting together different statements about these various men, it is possible to arrive at a fairly good understanding of modalism. For example, there were possibly some differences in the theologies of Noetus, Praxeas, Sabellius, and Marcellus; how serious is difficult to determine. It is certain, however, that each maintained the full deity of Jesus Christ while admitting of no distinction of persons in the Godhead.

The modalist doctrine is usually explained simply as the belief that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are only manifestations, or modes, of the one God (the monarchial), and not three distinct persons (hypostases). It should be distinguished from dynamic monarchianism which also upheld the oneness of God, but did so by claiming that Jesus was an inferior, subordinate being.  More precisely, modalistic monarchianism is the belief that considers “Jesus as the incarnation of the Godhead” or “the Father incarnate.”

See Trinity Doctrine Origininated Where Great

                      See GODHEAD Explained                  See WATER BAPTISM